American Appeal Advertising
Table of Contents
Creating a successful marketing campaign is difficult because of many reasons. Firstly, as the market grows, the competition grows, and it becomes more difficult to make one’s product or service stand out from the others and appeal to the target audience. Secondly, customers get used to constant marketing and advertisements surrounding them from TV-commercials and big boards on the streets to emails and social network ads. Thirdly, due to globalization, marketing trends are changing rapidly, and it is mandatory to keep up with them otherwise one’s project or organization will not be able to compete with the rivals and attract the needed amount of consumers. Finally, the companies meet constant financial challenges due to the economic crisis and business shifts, so they have to promote themselves in relatively difficult conditions. That is the reason the marketing campaign has higher chances of going unnoticed or not receiving the expected results and feedback.
One of the tools some companies use for marketing campaigns is controversial ads (Waller 2005). They enable the companies to draw attention to the products they sell and turn the campaign into the topic that is widely discussed in the media and society in general (Basu, Basu & Batra 1995). This is the strategy that has been widely practiced by American Apparel. This company sells clothes that are manufactured and designed in the
The campaign is based on the picture of a young woman. She stands with her top naked. The woman is of Bangladeshi descent, and across her chest, there is a statement: “Made in
In the end of the description, it is said that Maks wears High Waist Jeans that were made by 23 American workers in
The campaign caused a lot of controversy because it received both criticism and appraisal. The criticism comes because of the statement “Made in
Another controversy rises from the description the company provided. It states that Maks does not identify with a particular nation, so the statement that she was made in
Nevertheless, the marketing campaign received a lot of appraisal, too. American Apparel is well-known because it does not have sweatshops overseas unlike other franchises that use cheap working force in undeveloped countries. Having sweatshops is economically profitable, but the working conditions there are very bad, and the wages are low. Thus, American Apparel wanted to emphasize the fact that it does not use cheap labor and manufactures its products in the
American Apparel’s marketing strategy was to position itself as different and patriotic. It stated that it was not like other companies that were making money paying little salaries to people in undeveloped countries, but instead, operated in the
The company used an effective marketing strategy because it was a timely response to the events that attracted a worldwide attention (Mitchell 2002). Henceforth, the company’s marketing strategy was to be different and better. Dov Charney, who was the company’s CEO at that time, also issued a statement that the company condemns working conditions in
Henceforth, when putting “Made in
Financial Implications and Impact
When analyzing American Apparel’s ad, it is important to focus on its current economic situation and the way the commercial marketing strategy affected it. In 2009, the company fired 1,800 employees after the legal problems, and it experienced constant financial losses (Li, Hsu, & Chang 2014). This is a general tendency that is common for the entire country because the amount of production in the country dropped significantly, and if the companies did not start the production overseas, they would be losing more money, too. The Bureau of Labor Statistics showed that the amount of “apparel manufacturing establishments nationwide dropped nearly in half to
The financial results show the effectiveness of the marketing strategy because it played an important role in decreasing the financial losses and helping the company make some profits after the ad was released. The controversy is the main cause for this situation because it enabled the company to attract more attention and the ad was viewed by more people. Henceforth, one can say that it was a well-calculated marketing decision since it enabled the coompany to increase both its public recognition and financial situation.
The advertisement had a big impact on society and the customers. In regard to clients, it affected their perception of clothing manufacturing industry in general. The advertisement attracted attention to the issue of moving the companies overseas and made them recognize the problem. As most of the clothes in the
Besides, the controversy and overall coverage of the issue enabled businesses and customers to recognize the need to strengthen the national economy and provide locals with job opportunities so that they were able to make money out of clothes manufacturing. It strengthened the idea that the producers “should instead stay to help boost the local economy and provide jobs” (Bhasin 2013) as a major theme American Apparel has been speaking about for a long period of time.
The clients also developed new ideas regarding national and ethical perception because the advertisement focused on the issue of multiculturalism and identity. The fact that the model is Muslim enabled the customers to approach national identification issue from another perspective. Although some representatives of religious communities criticized the nakedness of the model’s body, it could be viewed as a strong personal statement about being able to present one’s body in the way the person wants without limiting oneself to cultural or religious aspects. The statement released by the company, said that it respected human body, and the advertisement was published in order to praise women and their choices (Sherman 2014). One can say that the advertisement enabled a new direction in a media communication because it provided the public with an opportunity to evaluate the ad and determine whether it was proper or offensive. From one perspective, it is true that it went against the basic doctrines of Islam, and since it appealed to the Islamic country as a country of origin, it could be viewed as offensive. On the other hand, it did not appeal to religion in general; quite the opposite, it tried to reduce the importance of religious boundaries and cultural characteristics, and it was also a good play on words taking into consideration the absence of sweetshops and model’s background.
It is important to point out a special characteristic of this marketing campaign which is Cause-Related Marketing (Berglind & Nakata 2005). Although the company did not donate or implement any social projects, the overall statement appeared as something related to a serious social problem. As a result, people viewed it as an ability to support a local producer, and they also approached it as a way to express their dissatisfaction with the working conditions abroad. “Made in Bangladesh” was a statement that promoted two very different ideas at the same time; from one perspective, it was a way to encourage people to buy locally and support national businesses and employees, and from the other perspective, it was a tool to attract attention to a big problem of cheap labor force when the organizations used people with lower incomes for making great profits.
This marketing campaign can be used as an effective example of the strategy that enables the company to increase its brand awareness, improve the reputation, increase retail merchandise activity, develop loyalty among customers and strengthen the relationships with the clients (Pracejus & Olsen 2004). It shows the current trends in the marketing like the necessity to attract people’s attention to a particular problem while selling the product; since the competition is so fierce that it is difficult to make the customers eager to buy a particular item if it is not different from others or does not raise an important issue. That is the reason why it is essential to make every product stand out from the others, so it was an influential strategy to use a controversy.
The campaign shows that the society wants not just a mere product, but a story that goes along with it; in other words, the customers want to benefit from buying the product by getting a new item and feeling they made a contribution. Since most companies compete with each other manufacturing very similar products, controversies and media coverage enable the competitors to perform better than the rivals and improve the financial situation which can be seen with American Apparel.
The case is also practical when analyzing current marketing strategies because it shows the importance of the reputation nowadays; and it also shows the necessity to follow the trends and tendencies as well as set the new ones (Pracejus & Olsen 2004). The company managed to develop its reputation thanks to its marketing campaigns, and it could also use popular trends and important ideas that dominated there. For instance, it used the trend towards globalism and multiculturalism in order to attract attention to its product; and it was a way to strengthen the reputation in a situation when the company was competing with other organizations selling the same items. The marketing strategy the company used also demonstrated the effectiveness of controversies in modern marketing because it was one of the most effective ways to attract wider media coverage without spending more finances on promotion involving different parties and appealing to various audiences.
Controversies as a marketing strategy can also lead to some tensions within the company, and they do not always bring the desired results (Berglind & Nakata 2005). American Apparel had been experimenting with different advertising before which caused stir and criticisms; and the unresolved conflicts within the company led to the change in management since the company got a new CEO and fired the previous CEO who was also its founder (Lutz 2014). Besides, the former CEO owns 44% shares of the company (Paton & Barrett 2014). This shows that the effective marketing strategy cannot solve all of the company’s problems if they have been influencing the organization’s performance for years, but it can improve its position, bring financial benefits, and enable the company to move in a more successful direction.